Later this calendar week the board of the California State Teachers Retirement System, or CalSTRS, will forward to the Legislature a report laying out options for raising higher contributions into the pension system to ensure its long-term viability.

The Legislature has avoided action for a decade, and Gov. Jerry Brown's  budget forecast for didactics, with healthy projections for revenue, doesn't take into business relationship the daunting cost of teachers' pensions on the expense side of the ledger.

This shows the funding ratio of CalSTRS' defined benefit program for the past 35 years, through 2011. After being fully funded by 2000, the Legislature expanded benefits. Values fell, recovered, then plummeted in 2008 (click to enlarge).

Funding ratio of CalSTRS' defined benefit program for the past 35 years, through 2011. After being fully funded by 2000, the Legislature expanded benefits. Values fell, recovered, then plummeted in 2008. (Click for  a clearer image)

The remedies won't come inexpensive. The pick that CalSTRS financial analysts recommend would boost payments, currently about $6 billion, by $iv.5 billion per twelvemonth, starting next twelvemonth. That corporeality, a whopping 75 percent increment per year – would exist borne mostly past the land and by Yard-12 and customs college districts, as employers and not by current employees. If adopted by the Legislature, that option – diverting billions of dollars from the classroom into pensions – could dampen, if not dash, districts' hopes for replenishing their own depleted budgets. Yet that selection, which CalSTRS CEO Jack Ehnes is expected to recommend in a embrace letter of the alphabet to the report, is the only one that would restore CalSTRS' defined benefit program to full funding in 30 years, consequent with federal government accounting standards.

Anticipating that lawmakers would want to contrivance that bullet, however, the 26-page study presents vii other, cheaper alternatives that would fall well short of that 30-year, 100 percent funding goal – by delaying the start of higher contributions by a few years, phasing in increases gradually or aiming for only 80 percent funding. Setting a target of 80 percent of funding over 30 years would lower the contribution increases from fifteen.1 percent to 12.1 percentage, requiring $iii.6 billion in almanac increases, near $1 billion less, split among districts and the state.

Another option is to stretch out the goal of full funding to 75 years. Merely even that target would still cost $ii.9 billion more than in yearly payments into the alimony system while leaving CalSTRS merely 62 percent funded after 30 years. That option likewise would saddle additional generations of state taxpayers and teachers with decades more of college payments.

One alternative not presented is to do nothing. CalSTRS would then gradually deplete its assets and get bankrupt in 2046. At that signal, it would convert to a pay-as-y'all-go pension system, requiring contributions equaling fifty percent of an employee's pay, according to the report.

Next to CalPERS, which serves other state and local public employees, CalSTRS is the state'due south 2nd largest pension system. Information technology's nonetheless recovering from the 2008 plunge in real estate values and the stock market slide that wiped out 25 percent of the value of the portfolio for CalSTRS' defined benefit program and has left it only 69 per centum funded to meet its long-term obligations; liabilities to current and future retirees exceeded assets by $64 billion.

That was as of June 30, 2011, the most recent year that the CalSTRS board has to human activity on. Reflecting recent gains in the stock market, even so, CalSTRS had an impressive 13.v percentage rate of return for the year ending Dec. 31, 2012. The value of its assets – $157.8 billion on Dec. 31 – edged closer to its high indicate of $172 billion in 2007.

Two different options for CalSTRS' recovery. Under this scenario, the $64 billion deficit would be wiped out in 30 years by raising contributions 17.2 percent, by increments of 3 percent, starting next year. The value of assets would actually continue to fall for the first few years, then steadily rise. Source: CalSTRS (click to enlarge).

Ii different options for CalSTRS' recovery. Under this scenario, the $64 billion deficit would be wiped out in xxx years past raising contributions, as a percentage of an employee's pay,  17.2 percentage points, by increments of 3 percent annually, starting next year. The value of assets would actually continue to fall for the first few years, then steadily ascent. Source: CalSTRS. (Click for a clearer paradigm)

However, recent gains don't make up for years of lost earnings. Had the target annual render on assets of seven.five pct been met since 2000, CalSTRS would be more fully funded. Instead, the written report notes, it would now take five straight years with a 17 pct return on avails, followed by 25 years of hitting the earnings goal of 7.5 percent annually, to reach full funding without the demand for boosted payments into the system – an implausible scenario. Last year, at Brown's urging, the Legislature passed a parcel of public employee pension reforms. Merely considering reduced pension benefits will affect only employees hired subsequently Jan. 1, 2013, nigh all of the savings to the arrangement won't be felt for decades, and won't reduce the need to deal now with CalSTRS' arrears.

Under this option, which CalSTRS actuaries would discourage,

Under this pick, which CalSTRS actuaries would discourage the Legislature from adopting, the goal would be just lxxx per centum fully funding the alimony programme in 75 years, not 100 percent funding in 30 years, by adding incremental contributions of only 1.5 percent of an employee's pay per yr, leveling out at 11.3 pct more than. Just at the end of 30 years, the plan would be only 55 pct funded, leaving it more vulnerable to stock market swings. Source: CalSTRS (Click for a clearer image).

CalSTRS has relied on gains in investments to run across 58 percent of the obligations paid out to retirees and on contributions from teachers, K-12 and community college districts and the state for the other 42 per centum. Different the CalPERS board, which can adjust the amount that government employers accept to pay into the arrangement – and already has ratcheted rates upward – CalSTRS must rely on the Legislature to fix contribution levels.

Payments into the organisation currently total 21.45 per centum of a teacher'due south or administrator'south pay, split up three ways.

  • The employee pays viii percent (a level that's been constant since 1972);
  • The district equally employer pays viii.25 percent;
  • The land pays five.2 pct.

To reach total funding in thirty years would require boosted contributions of 15.1 percent of pay by some combination of the employee, the school district and the state, bringing in $iv.5 billion to the system, equally of July ane, 2014. But here'south the rub: The Legislature could brand new school employees share the increase, merely courts have ruled that the Legislature tin can't increment the contribution rates of current school employees without giving them a do good equal to the value of their increased contribution, similar higher pay. The outcome: The country, through the Full general Fund, and districts will have to absorb most of any increase in contribution levels. The study suggests that in that location may exist a style, by deft legal maneuvering, to increase employee contributions by a maximum 2.half dozen percentage points.

1 important, unresolved question is whether higher CalSTRS contributions by districts would require the Legislature to increase Proposition 98 funding for 1000-12 and community colleges by an equal amount. A 2006 opinion by the Attorney General's office said no; the Legislative Counsel disagreed, according to the study. Without an increase in Proposition 98 funding, districts would take to absorb higher pension costs within their existing budgets. Each percentage point increase in contributions would cost the General Fund or districts virtually $300 one thousand thousand, according to the report.

There is no easy solution

During their give-and-take of the report terminal Friday, some lath members expressed reluctance to even offer options that clearly would not get CalSTRS to full funding, like the 75 year payback period or raising contributions less than a percentage point per year or simply enough to push back insolvency a few years.

"It is human nature; legislators will look for the cheapest way out," said California'southward Chief Deputy Superintendent Richard Zeiger. "We need to say that some of the options will non meet the fundamental requirement."

Regardless of what the Legislature does now, it volition take to adjust CalSTRS' contributions periodically, because there volition exist years when the system exceeds its projected charge per unit of return, and years, similar 2008, when it falls drastically short.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource'southward no-cost daily e-mail on latest developments in pedagogy.